Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Andrew J. Maduk v. Headquartered at CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv09340
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Maduk
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Headquartered at CVS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Shannon Clark v. Garfield Beach CVS, LLC, et al
as 22-55844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
GARFIELD BEACH CVS, LLC, Erroneously Sued As CVS Pharmacy Inc. and KAREN S. LYNCH, CVS Pharmacy
Shannon Clark v. Garfield Beach CVS, LLC, et al
as 22-55590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANNON CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
GARFIELD BEACH CVS, LLC, Erroneously Sued As CVS Pharmacy Inc. and KAREN S. LYNCH, CVS Pharmacy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
