Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tutankhaman v. United States Secret Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01527
Plaintiff: King Michael Tutankhaman, Grand Royal Prince Michael Dumpledore III and Michael Maxwell Hill
Defendant: United States Secret Service
Moss v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff: Eric Brandon Moss Phountainhead 501c3; Email: ericbmoss@gmail.com doing business as Healing Eden
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency, Donald J. Trump, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Brnovich, et al v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-15518
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA, AL REBLE and others
Defendant / Appellant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Maxey v. United States Secret Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00367
Plaintiff: James C. Maxey
Defendant: United States Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrone Hurt v. United States Secret Service, et al
as 12-15919
Plaintiff - Appellant: TYRONE HURT
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Michael Moss, et al v. Tim Wood, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36172
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL MOSS, LESLEY ADAMS, BETH WILCOX and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, of the Department of Homeland Security, RALPH BASHAM, Former Director of the United States Secret Service, in his individual capacity, JOHN DOE, 1, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities, participating in these actions and known to the Defendant Secret Service, but unknown at this time to Plaintiffs and others
Defendant - Appellant: TIM WOOD, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities and ROB SAVAGE, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities
Michael Moss, et al v. Ron Ruecker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-36152
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL MOSS, LESLEY ADAMS, BETH WILCOX and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, of the Department of Homeland Security, RALPH BASHAM, Former Director of the United States Secret Service, in his individual capacity, TIM WOOD, United States Secret Service Agent, in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant - Appellant: RON RUECKER, Superintendent of the Oregon State Police, in his official and individual capacities, ERIC RODRIQUEZ, former Captain of the Southwest Regional Headquarters of the Oregon State Police, in his official and individual capacities, TIM F. MCCLAIN, Superintendent of the Oregon State Police, in his official capacity and others
Moss, et al v. U.S. Secret Service, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-36018
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL MOSS, LESLEY ADAMS, BETH WILCOX and others
Defendant: U.S. SECRET SERVICE, of the Department of Homeland Security and RALPH BASHAM, Former Director of the United States Secret Servcie, in his individual capacity
Defendant - Appellant: TIM WOOD, United States Secret Service Agent, in his offical and individual capacities and ROB SAVAGE, United States Secret Service Agent, in his offical and individual capacities
Mercier et al v. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2007cv01747
Plaintiff: George Mercier, Carol Ann Mercier and Marisa C. Mercier
Defendant: Department of Justice, United States Marshals, United States Secret Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mercier v. United States District Court et al
as 2:2006cv01125
Plaintiff: George Mercier
Defendant: United States District Court, United States of America, Federal Grand Jury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?