Cases 91 - 100 of 146
Dorsey v. Fleming et al
as 2:2012cv02258
Plaintiff:
Dennis Earl J. Dorsey, Jr
Defendant:
David Fleming, Ben Sanders and Jane and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casella v. Frank et al
as 1:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Casella
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Tommy Johnson, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooper v. Robbins et al
as 3:2012cv01909
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hooper
Defendant:
Robert Robbins, Troy Siefer, Jim Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lujan v. George et al
as 1:2012cv01675
Defendant:
Doe's 1-10, Bill Ford, Tim George and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lujan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2012cv00299
Plaintiff:
Edward Louis Dean
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Heather Kimura and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Fischer v. Daniel Griffith, et al
as 12-35383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK J. FISCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL GRIFFITH, Correctional Officer and JOHN DOES 1-10
Eural Debbs, Sr. v. City of Seattle, et al
as 12-35186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EURAL DEWAYNE DEBBS, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, KING COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, KING COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
William Ramsely v. Hawaii Paroling Authority, et al
as 12-15507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM RAMSELY
Defendant - Appellee:
HAWAII PAROLING AUTHORITY, STATE OF HAWAII, ROY REEBER, ALBERT TUFONO and others
Cetaj v. King County et al
as 2:2011cv02176
Plaintiff:
Valmir Cetaj
Defendant:
King County , King County Department of Corrections , Music and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Read et al
as 1:2011cv00724
Plaintiff:
William Torres
Defendant:
Thomas Read and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
