Cases 131 - 140 of 12,511
Johnston v. Isack
as 3:2024cv05270
Plaintiff:
Jacob A Johnston
Defendant:
Jamie Isack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Hurt et al
as 2:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
John Hurt and Phillip Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Jesse Thomas Fuller
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Felder v. Ahern
as 2:2024cv00381
Petitioner:
Marcus Dieter Felder and Marcus Felder
Respondent:
Gregory J. Ahern and Gregory J Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Farnsworth v. Furst et al
as 3:2024cv05275
Plaintiff:
Charles V Farnsworth
Defendant:
M.L. Furst, D Dahne and Kathy Reninger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randhawa v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Satnam S Randhawa
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Mark Phillip, Mark Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melton v. USPTO et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Melton
Defendant:
USPTO, LexisNexis and Google Chrome Extensions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gossett v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05130
Petitioner:
Mark J Gossett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
