Cases 171 - 180 of 202
Hurtado v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2008cv01429
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Hurtado
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kennedy v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2008cv01268
Petitioner:
Robert R. Kennedy
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2008cv00880
Petitioner:
Thornell Brown
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Martin v. James Walker, et al
as 08-15752
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES W. MARTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES WALKER, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Amicus Curiae:
THE HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER and OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL DEFENDERS FOR THE EASTERN, CENTRAL AND NORTHERN DISTRICTS OF CALIFORNIA
Bush v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2008cv00378
Petitioner:
Kelvin Bush
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2007cv01453
Petitioner:
Ramiro Garza
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Obujen v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2007cv01309
Petitioner:
Douglas Obujen
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jablonski v. Ayers
as 3:2007cv03302
Petitioner:
Phillip Carl Jablonski
Defendant:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr.
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Davis v. On Habeas Corpus
as 5:2007cv03232
Petitioner:
Bryant E. Davis
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramiro Munoz Garza v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2007cv00763
Petitioner:
Ramiro Munoz Garza
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
