Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 262
TL Harvey v. AK CHIN Indian Community, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-16875
Plaintiff / Appellant: TL HARVEY
Defendant / Appellee: AK CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY, believe to be municipal corporation, AK CHIN TRIBAL GAMING AGENCY, part of AK CHIN Community, CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, AK Chin operator of Chop Block Restaurant doing business as Chop Block Restauran and others
(PC) Hill v. Her, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01849
Plaintiff: Cymeyon Hill
Defendant: Her, NR. Laderman and Laderman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Her et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv06063
Plaintiff: Cymeyon V. Hill
Defendant: NR. Her and NR. Laderman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Luckey, et al v. Rachel Mitchell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-16556
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAMUEL LUCKEY, AARON DROMIACK, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated and ARIZONA ATTORNEYS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Defendant / Appellee: RACHEL H. MITCHELL, in her official capacity as County Attorney for Maricopa County
Clarence Jones v. M. Rojas, et al
as 22-35699
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLARENCE EUGENE JONES
Defendant / Appellee: M. ROJAS, In her official and individual capacity as law librarian of Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, PAYNTER, Lieutentant, in his official and individual capacity as Officer-in-Charge of Complex Two at the Snake River Correctional Institution, HOUSTON, Lieutentant, in his official and individual capacity as Reviewing Officer of Misconduct Report at the Snake River Correctional Institution and others
Timothy Wilkins v. Correctional Officers, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55745
Plaintiff / Appellant: TIMOTHY DEANORE WILKINS
Defendant / Appellee: CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, JONES, Correctional Sergeant, individual, LUND, Correctional Officer, individual and others
De Witt Long v. Sugai, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15997
Plaintiff / Appellant: DE WITT LAMAR LONG
Defendant / Appellee: SGT. SUGAI, Correctional Sgt. at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued in his/her individual and official capacities, LYLE ANTONIO, Chief of Security at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued in his/her individual and official capacities, SGT. WYATT, Correctional Sgt. at Halawa Correctional Facility, sued in his/her individual and official capacities and others
Jean-Pierre Ronet v. Heston Silbert, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15942
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEAN-PIERRE RONET
Defendant / Appellee: HESTON SILBERT, Director, STEPHEN MORRISON, Administrative Service Manager, Arizona Department of Public Safety, in his official and individual capacity, DANIEL KILEY, Judge-Superior Court and others
Ashok Babu, et al v. Gregory Ahern, et al
as 22-15886
Plaintiff / Appellee: ASHOK BABU, ROBERT BELL, IBRAHIM KEEGAN-HORNSBY and others
Appellant: KEVIN DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: GREGORY J. AHERN, Sheriff; in his official capacity as Sheriff of the Alameda County Sheriffs Office, CAROL BURTON, in her official capacity as Interim Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency, KARYN L. TRIBBLE, in her official capacity as Director of the Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services Agency and others
Defendant: ANDRE GRIFFIN, RAYANN KRUM, CHRISTOPHER MOSS and others
Lafonzo Turner v. B. Cash, et al
as 22-55539
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAFONZO R. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee: B. M. CASH, individual and Warden, in her official capacity, FORTSON, individual and Captain, in his official capacity, M. BUECHTER, individual and Captain, sued in her official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?