Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Theron Maxton v. Bureau of Prisons Director et al
as 5:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Director, U.S. Attorney General and Dr. Rutledge
Plaintiff:
Theron Maxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mehmood v. United States et al
as 2:2018cv02873
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and United States
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sessions et al
as 3:2018cv05234
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, United States, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2016cv03568
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission, U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Juan David Vasquez-Uribe v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 2:2015cv06807
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Juan David Vasquez-Uribe
Demos v. The State of Washington
as 5:2014cv05474
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of Washington, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, US Maritime Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01914
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Deshawn D Leslie v. Barack Obama et al
as 2:2013cv01418
Petitioner:
Deshawn D Leslie
Respondent:
Barack Obama and U.S. Attorney General
Thomas v. McEwen et al
as 3:2012cv02589
Plaintiff:
Rayshon Thomas
Defendant:
L. S. McEwen, G. J. Janda, M. Martell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rafael Benitez v. Sandra Hutchens et al
as 8:2012cv00550
Plaintiff:
Rafael Benitez
Defendant:
Sandra Hutchens, Tony Rackauckas and U.S. Attorney General Holder
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
