Cases 21 - 30 of 879
Manuel Ortega et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2023cv02636
Plaintiff:
Victor Rosas, Manuel Ortega, Ricardo Rosas and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kathleen Allison, Warden Neil McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Watson v. Diaz et al
as 1:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
William Xavier Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Diaz, Sanchez and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Gonzalez
as 3:2023cv06552
Plaintiff:
Sammy B. Sanchez
Defendant:
Doctor Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Harris v. Phillips et al
as 1:2023cv01713
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
B. D. Phillips, L. Delafuente, E. Espalin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sanchez v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01706
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden, B. Cates, Officer Murro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Sanchez v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2023cv02806
Petitioner:
Anthony A. Sanchez
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winters v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2023cv06093
Petitioner:
Paul L. Winters
Respondent:
Yesenia Sanchez and California Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hogg v. Sanchez et al
as 3:2023cv06021
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Hogg, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Yesenia L. Sanchez, R. Quinteros and R. Nixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ismail Mora v. E. Sanchez et al
as 2:2023cv09635
Plaintiff:
Ismail Mora
Defendant:
E. Sanchez, R. Roque, B. Garfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv05617
Plaintiff:
Hilbert Thomas
Defendant:
Oak Smith, S. Sanchez and J. Munger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
