Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Badillo v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 3:2008cv01331
Plaintiff:
Esteban G. Badillo
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara County Valley Health and Hospital System Aduit Custody Health Services and Santa Clara County Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nadasdy v. Santa Clara County Department of Correction et al
as 3:2007cv06284
Plaintiff:
Stephen Nadasdy
Respondent:
Santa Clara County Department of Correction and Elmwood Complex
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gutierrez v. Santa Clara County Department of Corrections and Dental Department
as 3:2007cv05999
Plaintiff:
Edward Gutierrez, Sr.
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Department of Corrections and Dental Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Musquez v. Santa Clara County et al
as 3:2007cv04623
Plaintiff:
Marcos L. Musquez
Defendant:
Santa Clara County, Santa Clara County Department of Corrections, D. Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez v. Santa Clara County Department of Corrections & Medical Department
as 3:2007cv04251
Plaintiff:
Edward Gutierrez, Sr.
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Department of Corrections & Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Tovar et al
as 3:2007cv01411
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Williams
Defendant:
Adam Tovar, San Jose Police Department and Santa Clara County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Santa Clara County Department of Corrections
as 5:2007cv01203
Plaintiff:
Sal Castillo
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennison v. Lane et al
as 3:2007cv00778
Plaintiff:
Darren Jay Dennison
Defendant:
Lane, Leipelt, Schnieder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
