Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Harris v. California Correctional Center et al
as 2:2017cv02621
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
California Correctional Center, P. Hainline, J. Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawthorne v. Kernan et al
as 4:2017cv04960
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Hawthorne, II
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, R. Davis, S Albritton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean Schwartzmiller v. K. Rodriguez, et al
as 17-55980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN A. SCHWARTZMILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
K. RODRIGUEZ, Psychologist at the Richard J. Donovan State Prison (RJD), JOHN LARSON, NBC News Correspondent, NBC NEWS and others
Shotwell v. Grounds et al
as 3:2017cv03629
Plaintiff:
Manuel Eugene Shotwell
Defendant:
R. T. Grounds, D. Asuncion, W. Muniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Paramo et al
as 3:2017cv01123
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Dorsey
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Scott Kernan, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric K'napp v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-15577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Schwartzmiller et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2017cv00538
Plaintiff:
Dean A. Schwartzmiller and Christopher Dean Harmon, JR.
Defendant:
K. Rodriguez, John Larson, NBC News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Rocha et al
as 3:2017cv00522
Plaintiff:
Jon W. Larson
Defendant:
J. Rocha, L. Vizcarra, R. Clarion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Galvin et al
as 2:2016cv02629
Plaintiff:
Nerrah Brown
Defendant:
J. Galvin, Jeff Macomber, B. Kukrall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Voong, et al.
as 1:2016cv01397
Plaintiff:
Richard E. George
Defendant:
M. Voong, J. Knight and J. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
