Cases 31 - 40 of 1,273
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craigen v. Gushwa et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
George W. Craigen
Defendant:
Dean Gushwa, Elizabeth Baker, O.P.D.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Monterey County Superior Court et al
as 4:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Monterey County Superior Court, Judge Lydia M. Villarreal, Judge Timothy P. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luevano v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Govenor Greg Abbott, State Bar of Texas and others
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murray v. Hassler et al
as 6:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Christin Hassler, Supervizer Dasiy, Judge to Be Named and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Conovers
as 6:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Judge Conovers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. McAlpin et al
as 6:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Judge McAlpin, Erik T Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
