Cases 31 - 40 of 922
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkerson v. O.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2023cv01865
Plaintiff:
William J. Parkerson
Defendant:
O.D.O.C., Whelan, C. Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Nejara et al
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Garbriela Nejara, Karissa Currier, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01826
Petitioner:
Marvin Randall
Respondent:
Oregon and Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Coffer v. Reyes et al
as 2:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Christopher Coffer
Defendant:
Reyes, DeLeon and R. Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middlekauff v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01817
Petitioner:
Darrell Kelly Middlekauff, Sr.
Respondent:
Superintendent Erin Reyes and Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watts v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Michael Watts
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, J. Quick, C. Jourdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellam-Meriwether v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01778
Petitioner:
John Ellam-Meriwether
Respondent:
Superintendent Erin Reyes and Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Julian Reyes v. J. Doerer
as 2:2023cv10051
Petitioner:
Julian Reyes
Respondent:
Warden J. Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reyes v. NDOC et al
as 2:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
Armando Vasquez Reyes
Defendant:
NDOC, High Desert State Prison, M. Manalastas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
