Cases 41 - 50 of 968
Smith v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Mary Smith
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Wellpath LLC, Rachel Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
Joseph Lombardo, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Clark County Detention Center
(PC) Watts v. Covello et al
as 2:2022cv02311
Plaintiff:
Vernell Watts
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Bryan Holmes, Jason Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ernesto Vega v. Bryan Birkholz
as 2:2022cv08977
Petitioner:
Ernesto Vega
Respondent:
Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, State of Nevada, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrel Brannon v. Orozco, et al
as 22-16728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREL GERRARD BRANNON
Defendant / Appellee:
OROZCO, Sgt., A. PACHECO, C/O, COVARRUBIAS, Sgt. and others
(PC) McClintock v. Valencia et al
as 2:2022cv01884
Plaintiff:
John Scott McClintock
Defendant:
G. Valencia, L. Cantu, J Cantu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tello v. Rayford
as 3:2022cv06050
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Tello
Defendant:
J. Rayford, R. Boyd, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Las Vegas Clark County
as 2:2022cv01632
Petitioner:
Jason Willis
Respondent:
Las Vegas Clark County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cesar Vega Duran v. W.L. Montgomery
as 2:2022cv06695
Petitioner:
Cesar Vega Duran
Respondent:
W.L. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
