Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Samut et al v. Chertoff, et al.
as 1:2008cv00599
Petitioner:
KASIM Munir Samut, Samad Begam Samut, IZHAAR Munir Samut and others
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Nancy Alcantar and Michael B. Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mejia v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2008cv02112
Petitioner:
Martha Rodriguez Mejia
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Nancy Alcantar and Michael B. Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dukuray v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv00548
Petitioner:
Mohamed Dukuray
Respondent:
Michael B Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and A. Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Tema v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv00544
Petitioner:
Jerry Tema
Respondent:
Michael B Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and A. Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shou En Chi v. Michael B Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv02290
Petitioner:
Shou En Chi
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Brian M DeMore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Singh v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv00540
Petitioner:
Jaspal Singh
Respondent:
Michael B Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and A. Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Awiis v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv00541
Petitioner:
Bakri Awiis
Respondent:
Michael B Mukasey, Michael Chertoff and A. Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Arriola-Rivas v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00509
Petitioner:
Sergio Arriola-Rivas
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Department of Homeland Security, Michael B Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
