Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Mitchell White v. Guy Hall, et al
as 09-35221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MITCHELL WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
GUY HALL, MAX WILLIAMS, THOMPSON, Food Services Mgr., TRCI and others
Christopher Bailey v. Steve Shelton, et al
as 09-35137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE SHELTON, MD, Individual capacity, GREGG LYTLE, MD, Individual capacity and B. WHELAN, Manager, Individual capacity
Kenneth Williams v. John Doe, et al
as 08-35893
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH G. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Dr., Intake Center, JOHN DOE, Dr., Oregon State Penitentiary, PRACTITIONER C. GUNDERSON and others
Riches v. Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, et al
as 3:2008cv03114
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, Bureau of Prisons and Kevin Whelan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rotish Singh v. V. Clark, et al
as 08-35652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROTISH VIKASH SINGH
Defendant - Appellee:
V. CLARK, T. HICKS, DR. STOUNE and others
Bailey v. Shelton et al
as 3:2007cv01905
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bailey
Defendant:
Steve Shelton, Gregg Lytle and B Whelan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wik v. Shelton et al
as 3:2007cv01726
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Wik
Defendant:
Steve Shelton, Gregg Lytle, B. Whelan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Hall et al
as 3:2007cv01574
Defendant:
Mr. Hall, Guy Hall, Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. USDC Southern District of California et al
as 3:2007cv00343
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
USDC Southern District of California, Judith N Keep, Whelan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
