Cases 51 - 60 of 80
Sylvester Mahone v. Pierce County, et al
as 11-35689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVESTER JAMES MAHONE
Defendant - Appellee:
PIERCE COUNTY, PIERCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, PAUL PASTOR, Pierce County Sheriff and others
Mulholland v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2011cv05459
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mulholland
Defendant:
Pierce County, Washington State, Pierce County Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2011cv05448
Plaintiff:
Wayne A Murphy
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Pierce County Jail Medical Care Center, Carlos Ortiz-Venegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Mahoney v. Pierce County Jail, et al
as 11-35321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE ALAN MAHONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
PIERCE COUNTY JAIL, PIERCE COUNTY, Municipality, SHELLEY HULL and others
Floyd v. City of Lakewood et al
as 3:2011cv05068
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leland Floyd
Defendant:
City of Lakewood, City of Tacoma, County of Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillard v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2010cv05581
Plaintiff:
Kent R Dillard
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Executive, Gerald Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2010cv05565
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Randall
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, pierce County Jail Medical Dept and Pierce County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahoney v. Pierce County Jail
as 3:2010cv05238
Plaintiff:
Steve Alan Mahoney
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Proctor et al
as 3:2009cv05711
Petitioner:
Carissa Marie Daniels and Carissa Marie Daniels
Respondent:
Paul Proctor and Pierce County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Larson v. King County et al
as 2:2009cv01564
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Larson
Defendant:
King County, Daniel Farr, Brian Gains and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
