Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Samuel Calhoun Arrington v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv04698
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calhoun Arrington
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Russ Graybull, Jonathan Jordan and others
Michael Flinner v. R. George, et al
as 12-55817
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FLINNER
Defendant - Appellee:
R. GEORGE, California Supreme Court Justice, M. LUCAS, California Supreme Court Justice, M. BAXTER, California Supreme Court Justice and others
Michael Lee v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00487
Defendant:
Allen, John Doe, Jesus Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Michael Lee v. United State of America et al
as 5:2012cv00366
Defendant:
C Bulloch, John Doe, I, John Doe, 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Michael Lee v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012cv00243
Defendant:
Mr Allen, John Doe, Jesus Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Bonneau v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2012cv00250
Defendant:
1-10 Unknown Defendant(s) to be determined through discovery, K. Barnett, Lt. Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bonneau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Spencer Brasure v. Governor Edmund G Brown et al
as 2:2012cv01027
Defendant:
10001-10500 Unknown Defendants, ALL Certified Death Penalty Approved Defense Attorneys, Arthur L. Alarcon and others
Plaintiff:
Spencer Brasure
Flinner v. George et al
as 3:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
Michael Flinner
Defendant:
R. George , M. Lucas , M. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan Bonneau v. J. Thomas, et al
as 12-35060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN FRANK BONNEAU
Defendant - Appellee:
J. E. THOMAS, CAPTAIN MANNING, IGNACIO DE LAS HERAS and others
Carlos J Avena v. Edmund G Brown et al
as 2:2012cv00485
Defendant:
10001 to 10500 Unknown Defendants, ALL Certified Death Penalty Approved Defense Attorneys, Arthur L Alarcon and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos J Avena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
