Cases 61 - 70 of 11,636
Erik Jackson Williams v. Riverside County et al
as 5:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Erik Jackson Williams
Defendant:
Riverside County, Riverside County Sheriff Department, Coello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
(HC) Rogers v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
John William Rogers
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorazio v. Reyes et al
as 3:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
William Dorazio
Defendant:
Erin Reyes, C. Dieter, Dr. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jalaal Abdullah v. Kelly Santoro et al
as 2:2024cv03139
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Ibn Abdullah
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, John or Jane Doe, K. Mixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
Heather L. Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnell v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Joe Baby Burnell
Defendant:
W. Montgomery, Ali Hasan, B. Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Dillingham v. K. Mills et al
as 2:2024cv02966
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dillingham
Defendant:
K. Mills, D. Williams, J. Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
William S. Boyd
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Charles Cox, P. Maney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
