Cases 71 - 80 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Park v. Clark et al
as 2:2007cv00866
Petitioner:
Jae Bong Park
Respondent:
Neil Clark, Alberto Gonzales and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Kuznetsov v. Clark et al
as 2:2007cv00858
Petitioner:
David Kuznetsov
Respondent:
Neil Clark, Alberto Gonzales and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ernawati v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00852
Petitioner:
Fnu Ernawati
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and A Neil Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carlos Penafiel-Falcon v. Alberto Gonzales
as 8:2007cv00630
Petitioner:
Carlos Penafiel-Falcon
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bermudez v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv02831
Petitioner:
Jesus Valdez Bermudez
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and Nancy Alcantara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00979
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gomis v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00788
Petitioner:
Antoine Gomis
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff and Nancy Alcantar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
