Cases 71 - 80 of 815
(PC) Temple v. Gibson et al
as 2:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander Temple
Defendant:
Michael Gibson, Imo Ebong, Martin Cadeiras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00889
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Valles v. Kathleen Allison
as 23-55264
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW VALLES
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON
(PC) Rowley v. Allison et al
as 1:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Matthew Derrick Rowley
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Robert Burton, B. Burkhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Weisner v. Allison
as 2:2023cv00216
Petitioner:
Frankie Weisner
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gerald Lee Miller, Jr. v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2023cv00772
Petitioner:
Gerald Lee Miller, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and T. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Martinez v. Allison
as 1:2023cv00243
Petitioner:
Carlos Martinez
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Louis Peets v. Jerry Brown, Jr., et al
as 23-15101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS IVESTER PEETS
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Director of CDCR's Adult Institutions and others
Jared Martin v. De La Cruz, et al
as 23-15094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARED ANDREW MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DE LA CRUZ, CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON and others
Arocha v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Rudy Arocha
Defendant:
Acting Warden Trent Allen and Secretary Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
