Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Coss v. Placer County Court
as 2:2011cv01306
Petitioner:
Jeffrey N. Coss
Respondent:
Placer County Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kent v. Placer County et al
as 2:2009cv02829
Petitioner:
John Kent
Respondent:
Placer County, Placer County Sheriff Department, Placer County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodgers v. Placer County Sheriff's Department
as 2:2009cv01367
Plaintiff:
James T. Rodgers
Defendant:
Placer County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demastus v. Placer County Sheriff Office
as 2:2009cv01194
Petitioner:
Tommy L Demastus
Respondent:
Placer County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coss vs Placer County Court
as 2:2009cv00966
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Nathan Coss
Respondent:
Placer County Court
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goodspeed v. Placer County Sheriff
as 2:2008cv01947
Petitioner:
Tony Eugene Goodspeed
Respondent:
Placer County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hansen v. Marin County et al
as 4:2008cv03008
Plaintiff:
Alvin Hansen
Defendant:
Marin County, Placer County, Yolo County and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cervantes v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2007cv02550
Plaintiff:
Ralph Michael Cervantes
Defendant:
Placer County Superior Court, Mcalhaney, David Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Placer County Jail et al
as 2:2007cv01756
Defendant:
Placer County Jail, Sanchez and Griffith
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Placer County Sheriff Office, et al
as 2:2007cv00575
Plaintiff:
Darrell E. Polk
Defendant:
Placer County Sheriff Office and Lisa Mercado Valtox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
