Cases 81 - 90 of 1,131
Christopher Harbridge v. Reed, et al
as 22-55861
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HARBRIDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
REED, Captain in Charge of Facility-C, CSP-LAC
Defendant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GRAY DAVIS, JAMES E. TILTON and others
(PC)Robinson v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv01640
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Ty Jones and Alexander Acuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermaine Barnes v. Warren Mongomery
as 22-55849
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERMAINE ALEXANDER BARNES
Respondent / Appellee:
WARREN L. MONGOMERY, Warden
(PC) Robinson v. Acuna et al
as 2:2022cv01629
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Alexander Acuna, Ty Jones and Mason Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander-Campos v. Reinke et al
as 4:2022cv05253
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Alexander-Campos, lll and Robert E. Samuel
Defendant:
Benjermin Reinke, Thomas Walsh, Joseph Eichhorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv05103
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Ty Jones and Alexander Acuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crispin Granados v. State of Arizona, et al
as 22-16306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRISPIN GRANADOS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, CASTILLO, Sgt.; First name unknown, FITO, CO II; First name unknown and others
Robinson v. Acuna et al
as 4:2022cv04934
Plaintiff:
Javaughn Keanukawpono Robinson
Defendant:
Alexander Acuna, Ty Jones and Mason Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander Odette v. David Shinn
as 22-16269
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALEXANDER DUANE ODETTE
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director
Parsons v. San Jose Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv04691
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas Parsons
Defendant:
San Jose Police Department, Santa Clara County, William Todd Wellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
