Cases 1 - 10 of 521
Nnamdi Franklin Ojimba v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2024cv06570
Petitioner:
Nnamdi Franklin Ojimba
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jonathan Ramone Franklin v. Jose Esquetini et al
as 2:2024cv06528
Defendant:
Corrections Officer John Doe, Gonzalez, Gilliam and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ramone Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
James Franklin Snyder
Respondent:
Warden Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Franklin v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01822
Petitioner:
Christopher Franklin
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eytcheson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
Franklin Gene Eytcheson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brandon J. Franklin v. Salinas Valley State Prison
as 5:2024cv00647
Petitioner:
Brandon J. Franklin
Respondent:
Salinas Valley State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Adair v. Vue et al
as 2:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Adair
Defendant:
MacNaught, Shuman and Vue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Snyder
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Kootenai County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Tsetse v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Prince Franklin Tsetse
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Adair v. Nakken et al
as 2:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Adair
Defendant:
Joshua Nakken, Villalobos, Judy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
