Cases 1 - 10 of 1,371
(PC) Hasha v. Gamboa, et al.
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Robin L. Hasha
Defendant:
Martin Gamboa, Cecillo Velasco, Lacy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv03683
Plaintiff:
Yohonia Martin
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Gamboa
as 2:2024at00722
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Buchanan
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Buchanan v. Gamboa
as 2:2024cv01632
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Buchanan
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Cunningham et al
as 3:2024cv03208
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ed Martin
Defendant:
Dr. Britney Cunningham, Melanie Hoover and Nurse Carlo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Good v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Good
Defendant:
Patty Pearson, Michael Richlin, Alicia Richlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert E Martin v. Brandon Price
as 8:2024cv01118
Petitioner:
Robert Edwin Martin
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bibbs v. Melton et al
as 3:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
K. Melton, D. Moyer, V. Lizaola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel Arsenio Jacquez v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Manuel Arsenio Jacquez
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriff Department, Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Martin v. Price
as 1:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Robert E Martin
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
