Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Barnett v. Polk County et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Polk County, Mark Garton, Richard Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Deputy Cook et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barnett
Defendant:
Deputy Cook, Sgt. Redding, Lt. Bittick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Multnomah Defenders Incorporated et al
as 3:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Multnomah Defenders Incorporated, Stacey Redding and Martin Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. Redding Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2020cv01837
Defendant:
The Redding Deputy Sheriffs, Redding Sheriffs Department and Redding County Jail
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Polk County Jail et al
as 3:2016cv02341
Defendant:
Lowe, Polk County Jail, Redding and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rautio v. Polk County OR et al
as 3:2016cv01943
Defendant:
Sergeant Richard Bittick, District Attorney Aaron Brown, Lemarr Carver and others
Plaintiff:
Bryce Allen Rautio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodroffe v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2012cv00124
Defendant:
Cpl. Adamson, Walter M. Beglau, Brian Beleque and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00764
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alexander v. Williams et al
as 6:2010cv06154
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Alexander
Defendant:
Becker, Boman, Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
