Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jose Caro v. Mark Castellaw
as 12-55136
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE GUADALUPE CARO
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK CASTELLAW
Gabriel Cortez v. Matthew Cates, et al
as 11-17507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GABRIEL RUDY CORTEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATES, Esquire, RICHARD J. KIRKLAND, ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden and others
Jose Caro v. Mark Castellaw
as 11-56740
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE GUADALUPE CARO
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK CASTELLAW
Gavaldon v. Cate et al
as 4:2011cv02887
Plaintiff:
David Gavaldon
Defendant:
Mathew L. Cate, George V. Giurbino, Derral G. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Rochester v. Linda Rowe, et al
as 10-17772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHAWN ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA ROWE, MD, CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Dr., MICHAEL C. SAYRE and others
Todd Ashker v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-15526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD L. ASHKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Defendant:
JOE MCGRATH, RICHARD KIRKLAND, P. T. SMITH and others
Todd Ashker v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-15343
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TODD L. ASHKER
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Defendant:
JOE MCGRATH, RICHARD KIRKLAND, P. T. SMITH and others
England v. Horel et al
as 3:2010cv00153
Plaintiff:
Robert England
Defendant:
Robert Horel, Francisco Taquez, Michael Sayre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Castellaw et al
as 5:2009cv03259
Plaintiff:
Randall Dean Holmes
Defendant:
D. Castellaw, M. Cook, M. A. Smelosky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez v. Cate et al
as 5:2009cv03021
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rudy Cortez
Defendant:
Mathew L. Cate, Richard J. Kirkland, Robert A. Horel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
