Cases 1 - 10 of 2,508
(HC) Saechao v. Cates
as 2:2024cv02178
Petitioner:
David Saechao
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lane v. Cates et al
as 2:2024cv01763
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lane
Respondent:
Brian Cates and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Abarca v. Reyes, et al.
as 1:2024cv00624
Defendant:
Cates and G. Reyes
Plaintiff:
Cesar Abarca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Lane v. Cates et al
as 2:2024at00787
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lane
Respondent:
Brian Cates and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Crain v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Gary Crain
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Buckel et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A. Buckel, S. Steadman, T. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Sanchez v. Cates
as 1:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Sanchez v. Cates
as 2:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Sanchez v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01706
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden, B. Cates, Officer Murro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noe Moreno v. Brian Cates
as 2:2023cv08676
Petitioner:
Noe Moreno
Respondent:
Brian Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
