Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Cuagliotti v. Shank et al
as 2:2024cv02389
Defendant:
Ryan Farley, Unknown Party, Chandler, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Cuagliotti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nareau v. Chandler Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv01943
Plaintiff:
Tanya Delgadillo Nareau
Defendant:
Arizona State Prosecutors Office, Arizona State Public Defender's Office, American Express and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mata v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01232
Petitioner:
Christian J Mata
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Chandler, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Malay et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jamelle Russell
Defendant:
Malay, Breitenbach, Childers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2023cv02656
Plaintiff:
Bryce Jeffrey Hunter
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Jose Coronado, Marcelo Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Woods v LeGrand et al
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Woods
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, J. Chandler, Jim Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jamelle Russell
Defendant:
M. Gonzalez, Garrett, Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Jamelle Russell
Defendant:
LeGrand, Garrett, Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Wilcoxen et al
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jamelle Russell
Defendant:
C/O Wilcoxen, Garrett, LeGrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jamelle Russell
Defendant:
Hughes, Wilcoxen, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
