Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mark Brown, et al v. Alfred Guinee, et al
as 22-15426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK DAVID BROWN and VERNON EDWARD PELTZ, in his sole, and separate right
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFRED B. GUINEE, both individually and in his official capacity, ERIC P. HATCH, both individually and in his official capacity, MICHAEL A. KISBAUGH, both individually and in his official capacity and others
Benge v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2017cv00522
Defendant:
Secretary of State Jeanne Atkins, Alaxander R. Gardner, Ellen F. Rosenblum and others
Petitioner:
John Sherman Benge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peter McDaniels v. Pete Kremen, et al
as 14-35026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER J. MCDANIELS
Defendant:
PETE KREMEN, Whatcom County Executive
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL ELFO, Whatcom County Sheriff, WENDY JONES, Chief of Corrections, DAVID REYNOLDS, Juvenile Superior Court Administrator and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01244
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Reyes v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington et al
as 3:2008cv05159
Plaintiff:
Tomas Reyes
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Office of United States Attorney for the Western District of Washington, Office of Court Administrator and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Estacio, Jr. v. Oregon Court of Appeals
as 6:2007cv00520
Petitioner:
Federico De Jesus Estacio, Jr.
Respondent:
Oregon Court of Appeals
Defendant:
Jean Hill, Dept. of Corrections, Mult. County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estacio, Jr. v. State of Oregon
as 6:2007cv06031
Plaintiff:
Federico De Jesus Estacio, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Jean Hill, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
