Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Mitchell v. Fraker et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Defendant:
Katie Fraker and Nathanjah Breitenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Loftis v. White et al
as 1:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Defendant:
Dustin White, Y. Acosta, A. Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cortijo v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Cortijo
Defendant:
St. Andre, Rodriguez, Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Loftis v. Hill
as 1:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Loftis v. Hill
as 2:2022cv02299
Petitioner:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Loftis v. Arisco et al
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Marquise DeAngelo Loftis
Defendant:
A. Arisco, E. Garza, R. Montano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darden v. Inslee et al
as 2:2022cv00898
Plaintiff:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, Michael L Parsons, King County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Holt v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv00710
Petitioner:
DeAngelo DeShong Holt
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Darden v. Darden et al
as 3:2022cv05185
Plaintiff:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant:
Alvin Darden, Sr, Thurston County Police Department and Scott Ahlf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, Charles Daniels, Michael Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
