Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gregory Downs v. A. Chapman et al
as 2:2022cv08795
Plaintiff:
Gregory Downs
Defendant:
A. Chapman, Dr Kadada, Dr. Joffee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Farha v. Foss, et al.
as 2:2020cv02206
Defendant:
J. Frailey, R. St-Andre, J Farley and others
Plaintiff:
Mauwai Farha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Farha v. Foss, et al.
as 1:2020cv01549
Defendant:
J. Frailey, R. St-Andre, J Farley and others
Plaintiff:
Mauwai Farha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farha v. Foss et al
as 4:2019cv05472
Plaintiff:
Farha Mauwai and Mauwai Farha
Defendant:
R. St-Andre, J. Farley, T. Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Smith v. State of California, et al
as 11-17466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LENOIR SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, HDSP, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Vance Johnson v. D. Runnels, et al
as 11-17310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, J.M. BRIDDLE, R. GOWER and others
Edward Motley v. J. Smith, et al
as 11-17030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. MOTLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. SMITH, D. PEDDICORD, BEASLEY and others
Michael Smith v. State of California, et al
as 11-16694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LENOIR SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, HDSP, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER and others
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD A. RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
