Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 2:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
K. McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mackey v. Bloomfield et al
as 3:2022cv05105
Plaintiff:
Vincent Robert Mackey
Defendant:
Robert Bloomfield, Sgt. Baker, Lt. Teixiera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Dossman et al
as 5:2021cv03205
Defendant:
Perez, Fuette, R. Broomfield and others
Plaintiff:
Toriano Germaine Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barth v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2020cv08621
Defendant:
Warden Ron Broomfield and J. Bishop
Plaintiff:
Shawn Damon Barth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Arnold et al
as 3:2020cv07235
Defendant:
E. Sanders, Dan Bloomfield, S. Arana and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv01557
Defendant:
Michael Garcia, Abigail Dillon, Bonnie Dumanis and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Branlett Eugene Kimmons v. Dean Borders et al
as 5:2019cv00561
Defendant:
C. Munoz, T. Ellis, Dean Borders and others
Plaintiff:
Branlett Eugene Kimmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Nash v. Garry Lucas, et al
as 17-35537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH L. NASH
Defendant:
GARRY E. LUCAS
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD J. BISHOP, sued in his individual and official capacity, PAUL DOUGHER, sued in his individual and official capacity, KIM BELTRAN, sued in his individual and official capacity and others
Jeremy Bakke v. Clark County Jail, et al
as 16-35911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY PUTNAM BAKKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK COUNTY JAIL, RICHARD J. BISHOP, KIMBERLY BELTRAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
