Cases 1 - 10 of 34
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quair v. San Mateo County Superior Court et al
as 3:2020cv02273
Defendant:
Anne Bouliane, J. E Karesh, San Mateo County Superior Court and others
Plaintiff:
David Sabino Quair, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Walker v. Krueger
as 1:2018cv01055
Petitioner:
Jacoby Walker
Respondent:
J. E. Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. California State Prison Corcoran et al
as 1:2018cv00424
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
California State Prison Corcoran, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Biter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackman v. Brown et al
as 2:2017cv01708
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Coleman A Blease, Vance W. Raye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2015cv01614
Plaintiff:
Granville William Smith
Defendant:
T. Hernandez, M. Ureste, R. Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2015cv01542
Plaintiff:
Granville William Smith, IV
Defendant:
T. Hernandez, M. Ureste, R. Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen v. Williams et al
as 3:2014cv01245
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Earl Stephen
Defendant:
Hal Williams, K. Chappell, Totell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Peterson et al
as 5:2014cv00509
Plaintiff:
Troy J. Anderson
Defendant:
Mark A. Peterson, David O. Livingston, Joyce C. Sasse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.