Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witkowski v. Bludworth et al
as 4:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Jay Donald Witkowski
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Montana
Respondent:
Pete Bludworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schroeder v. USA
as 2:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Joshua Jay Schroeder
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bullshows v. Big Horn County District Court et al
as 9:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Harry Bartholemew Bullshows, Sr.
Defendant:
Big Horn County District Court and Jay Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witkowski v. Bludworth et al
as 4:2022cv00060
Petitioner:
Jay Donald Witkowski
Respondent:
Pete Bludworth and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Inslee et al
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Glenn Carter
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Barbra Madsen and Ronald Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branson v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kalem Jay Branson
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Bullock et al
as 6:2020cv00027
Plaintiff:
Raymond Arlen Holmes
Defendant:
Jay Easley, Steve Bullock and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
reed v. USA
as 1:2020cv00003
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Jay Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wallace v. Three Unknown Federal Agents et al
as 1:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Wallace
Defendant:
Robert Jay Dayton, Department of Corrections, Three Unknown Federal Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
