Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Garcia Nava v. Lundy
as 3:2024cv02808
Petitioner:
Juan L. Garcia Nava
Respondent:
Warden Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Gregory v. Lundy
as 2:2024cv01323
Petitioner:
Charles Walter Gregory
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Lipsey Jr. v. Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv03716
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr
Defendant:
Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy, Captain Z. Soisuvarn, Lieutenant A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battise Collins v. L. Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv03210
Plaintiff:
Battise Collins
Defendant:
L. Lundy, Swain and John Doe No. 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruce Haney v. L. Lundy
as 2:2024cv03159
Petitioner:
Bruce Haney
Respondent:
L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe A. Taylor-El et al v. Leanna Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv02611
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Taylor-El and Darrick L. Jones-Bey
Defendant:
Leanna Lundy, Erica Lake, J. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Torrez v. Lundy
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
Julio Angel Torrez, Jr.
Respondent:
L. Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jesse Allen Morrison v. Leanna Lundy
as 2:2024cv01850
Petitioner:
Jesse Allen Morrison
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick George Roehler v. L. Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Frederick George Roehler, II
Defendant:
L. Lundy, D. Williams, S. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Fields v. Lundy
as 2:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Darren Fields
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
