Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hash v. Petrovic et al
as 5:2022cv05255
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Petrovic, M. Giacomazzi, D. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hash v. Dorsey et al
as 5:2022cv05254
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Dorsey, M. Giacomazzi, P. G. Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hash v. Giacomazzi et al
as 5:2020cv01116
Defendant:
S. Lucas, C. Remillard, R. Persaud and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02388
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Harold McDaniel v. Randy Grounds, et al
as 11-16672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD P. MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden, Warden, DAN CARNAZZO, C & PR Staff, P. MULLEN, Appeal Staff and others
Ronald Bratton v. Ben Curry, et al
as 10-16471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BRATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, D. SOTO, W. B. CHILDRESS and others
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
GREG SHEFFIELD
Ronald Bratton v. Ben Curry, et al
as 09-17820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BRATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, W. MARTINUS, Correctional Officer, B. R. PEOPLES and others
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
GREG SHEFFIELD
Goodlow v. Tucker et al
as 3:2009cv05786
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Goodlow
Defendant:
C. Tucker, M. Evans, E. Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazil v. Aquil et al
as 3:2008cv04559
Plaintiff:
Sean Ellington Brazil
Defendant:
Tariq A. Aquil, E. D. Palmer, P. G. Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bratton v. Curry et al
as 3:2008cv02788
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bratton
Defendant:
Ben Curry, W. Martinus, B. R. Peoples and others
3rd Party Defendant:
Greg Sheffield
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
