Cases 1 - 10 of 313
Keiron Elias v. J. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv07539
Defendant:
J. Doe, Riverside D.A.S. Office, Det. Nuriether and others
Plaintiff:
Keiron M. Elias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01598
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Khan v. Presley et al
as 5:2024cv03905
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, M. Botello, D. Metcalf and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teryaeva-Reed v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv03910
Defendant:
Melissa Rios-Marques, Colette S. Peters, Kathleen Tommey and others
Plaintiff:
Julia Teryaeva-Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffrey G. Randolph v. Glenice Short Randolph et al
as 2:2024cv05018
Defendant:
Cheri Grant, Lancaster Superior Court, Sakia Cowans and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery G Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taiwan Orran Reed v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00796
Petitioner:
Taiwan Orran Reed
Respondent:
Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Mychal Reed
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) McEwen v. Driscoll et al
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Darel McEwen
Defendant:
Michael Driscoll, Johnathan Reed, Carly Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Stricklin et al
as 5:2024cv00717
Defendant:
Jenee Reed, Robin Stricklin, Sean Tumacder and others
Plaintiff:
Khan Muhammad and Muhammad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Buckel et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A. Buckel, S. Steadman, T. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
