Cases 1 - 10 of 80
(PC) Jacques v. Jung et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
Jung, B. Jones and Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reid v. Rivera et al
as 2:2023cv01937
Plaintiff:
Tommy Jay Eugene Joseph Reid
Defendant:
Rivera, Essex and Garica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reid v. Allison et al
as 1:2022cv01437
Plaintiff:
Carlton L. Reid
Defendant:
Cathline Allison and Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin James Reid v. Bureau of Prisons Employees et al
as 5:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Calvin James Reid
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Employees, J. Vargas, M. Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reid v. Nash et al
as 1:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Reid
Defendant:
CMO Jason Nash, Dr. K., Barry Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Roshaun Reid v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00752
Petitioner:
Kenneth Roshaun Reid
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden M. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walter R Reid v. Jason Nash et al
as 2:2022cv02833
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Reid
Defendant:
CMO Jason Nash, Dr. K., P.A. Barry Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reid v. Barba et al
as 1:2022cv00344
Plaintiff:
Carlton L. Reid
Defendant:
Jason Barba, Steven Smith, Steve Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Roshaun Reid v. United States
as 2:2022cv01812
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Roshaun Reid
Defendant:
United States, Officer B. Mariscal, B. Mariscal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Reid v. Sherman
as 2:2020cv01596
Petitioner:
Carlton L. Reid
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
