Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Walter Sayles v. Alameda Superior Court
as 3:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
Walter Sayles
Respondent:
Alameda Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walter Sayles v. Alameda Superior Court
as 2:2023cv00686
Petitioner:
Walter Sayles
Respondent:
Alameda Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walter Sayles v. Alameda County Superior Court
as 2:2022cv01338
Plaintiff:
Walter Sayles
Defendant:
Alameda County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sayles v. Alameda County, Superior Court
as 5:2021cv08243
Petitioner:
Walter Sayles
Respondent:
Alameda County, Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sayles v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2018cv01007
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Nevada Department of Corrections, Offender Management Division and others
Plaintiff:
Daryle E Sayles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hartmann v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2008cv03094
Plaintiff:
Shawna Hartmann
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, California State Personnel Board, Division of Adult Institutions and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hartmann v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2008at01532
Plaintiff:
Shawna Hartmann
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, State Personnel Board, Division of Adult Institutions and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sayles v. USA
as 2:2008cv03837
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Uzeegoa Makeba Sayles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sayles v. Clark County Detention Center
as 3:2008cv00088
Plaintiff:
Darryl E. Sayles
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
