Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(HC) Barnes v. Supreme Court Judges et al
as 2:2021cv01649
Petitioner:
Antoine DeShawn Barnes
Respondent:
Supreme Court Judges and BPH Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Douglas Lasance v. Warden et al
as 2:2021cv06501
Petitioner:
Douglas Lasance
Respondent:
Warden, Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sara Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Douglas Lasance v. Warden et al
as 1:2021cv01195
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lasance
Defendant:
Warden, Gavin Newsom, Sara Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Barnes v. Supreme Court Judges et al
as 1:2021cv01078
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Defendant:
Supreme Court Judges, Gavin Newsom, CDCR Secretary Prop 57 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Diaz et al
as 1:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, John Edwards, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poore v. California Supreme Court Judges et al
as 3:2016cv05980
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eric Poore
Defendant:
California Supreme Court Judges and California State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luevano v. Secretary of State
as 4:2015cv00202
Petitioner:
Jaime Luevano
Respondent:
Secretary of State, US Texas Judges, Fifth Circuit Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Nichols v. State of Montana, et al
as 12-36075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RICHARD NICHOLS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MONTANA, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and MONTANA SUPREME COURT JUDGES, Morris, Wheat, Cotter, Nelson, Baker
Beeson v. Copsey et al
as 1:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Justin Milo Beeson
Defendant:
Cheri Copsey, David Navarro, Idaho Legislators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris Dajon Miller v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2010cv05078
Defendant:
California Supreme Court Judge, Judge J. Cooper, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Norris DaJon Miller
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
