Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America v. 747,664.15 Seized from Saxo Payments Account 1262
as 2:2018cv08753
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Defendant:
747,664.15 (POUNDS) Seized from Saxo Payments Account '1262 and 747,664.15 Seized from Saxo Payments Account 1262
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Any Interest or Principal Payments associated with "Loan 1 of 2" represented by Check #81600 for $2,500,000 et al
as 2:2014cv01060
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Any Interest or Principal Payments associated with "Loan 1 of 2" represented by Check # 81600 for $2,500,000 and Any Interest or Principal Payments associated with "Loan 2 of 2" represented by Check # 81601 for $2,500,000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Any Interest or Principal Payments associated with "Loan 1 of 2" represented by check # 81600 for $2,500,000 et al
as 2:2014at00528
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Any Interest or Principal Payments associated with "Loan 1 of 2" represented by check # 81600 for $2,500,000 and Any Interest or Principal Payments associated with "Loan 2 of 2" represented by check # 81601 for $2,500,000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Approximately $538,155.00 seized from ING Direct Checking Account, et al.
as 2:2013mc00071
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $538,155.00 seized from ING Direct Checking Account, 2011 Ferrari California Convertible, VIN: ZFF65 LJA0B 01766 22, 2011 Audi A5 Convertible, VIN: WAULFAFH9BN009524 and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. $6,984.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2009cv00257
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$6,984.00 in United States Currency and One $500 Integrated Payment Systems Money Order
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
