Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ellis v. Matheson Trucking, Inc.
as 2:2020cv01481
Defendant:
Matheson Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michele Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01178
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Van Kempen v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00660
Plaintiff:
Roy Van Kempen
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salvador Carrillo v. Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05657
Defendant:
Jeremiah Berlinger, Does, Robert Junkin and others
Plaintiff:
Salvador Carrillo
Larry Ambriz et al v. Matheson Tri-Gas
as 2:2014cv04546
Plaintiff:
Larry Ambriz, Salvador Carrillo, Randall Courtney and others
Petitioner:
Marco A Chavez and David Cintat
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas
Ambriz et al v. Matheson Tri-Gas
as 3:2014cv01041
Plaintiff:
Larry Ambriz , Salvador Carrillo , Marco A Chavez and others
Defendant:
Matheson Tri-Gas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matheson v. Gamestop, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01812
Plaintiff:
Alex Matheson
Defendant:
Gamestop, Inc. and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Albert Marrero Jr et al v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 2:2010cv06059
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Scott B Cherrin, Richard Joseph, Albert Marrero, Jr and others
Matheson v. Mills College Employee Benefit Plan et al
as 5:2008cv04385
Plaintiff:
Steven Matheson
Defendant:
Mills College Employee Benefit Plan and Standard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chao v. Matheson, et al
as 07-35633
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ELAINE L. CHAO, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL MATHESON, an individual doing business as Baby Zack's Smoke Shop, CATHY MATHESON, an individual, FELICIA MATHESON, an individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
