Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tejeda v. Boston Market Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01497
Plaintiff:
Jose Tejeda
Defendant:
Boston Market Corporation doing business as Boston Market, Boston Chicken of AZ LLC doing business as Boston Market, Unknown Parties named as John Doe Corporations I-XX doing business as Boston Market and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tejeda v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 3:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Luis Tejeda
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and A.M. Ortega Construction, Inc. Life Insurance Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Tejeda v. Vulcan Materials Company et al
as 3:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Juan Manuel Tejeda
Defendant:
Vulcan Materials Company and Calmat Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Richard Whitney et al v. Bielski Specialty Services Inc
as 2:2013cv00821
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony, Darryl Brandt, Brick Masons Apprenticeship Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Bielski Specialty Services Inc
Richard Whitney et al v. Advanced Masonry Inc
as 2:2012cv03896
Defendant:
Advanced Masonry Inc
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony, Darryl Brandt, Brick Masons Apprenticeship Training Fund and others
Gregorio Tejeda v. Con-Agra Foods, Inc.
as 08-16599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORIO TEJEDA
Defendant - Appellee:
CON-AGRA FOODS, INC.
Jonathan Tejeda et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2008cv01590
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tejeda, Jonathan Tejeda, Jonathan Tejeda and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Richard Whitney et al v. Gerry Smith Masonry, Inc.
as 2:2007cv02310
Plaintiff:
Richard Whitney, Julie Salazar, Rennie C Tejeda and others
Defendant:
Gerry Smith Masonry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
