Cases 91 - 100 of 10,771
Ashby v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05056
Plaintiff:
Marissa Ashby
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Galvez v. O'Malley
as 24-3569
Plaintiff:
LYDIA GALVEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Hastie-Sanders v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
Landon William Hastie-Sanders
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Irving Randall Brown, Jr. v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04736
Plaintiff:
Irving Randall Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brittany Antoinette Robles v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv01193
Plaintiff:
Brittany Antoinette Robles
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Peter Tolan v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv04763
Plaintiff:
Peter Tolan
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Matt Townsley and Chris Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gando v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Fatin Sawa Gando
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Neifert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Melvin Thomas Neifert
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Commet v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Mark Commet
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Quantrille v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03083
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Quantrille
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
