Cases 91 - 100 of 2,825
Doe v. Washoe County School District/NV, et al.
as 24-945
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, as Guardian of J. Doe, a minor and in her individual capacity
Defendant:
WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT/NV, its Board of Trustees, SUSAN ENFELD, Dismissed per ECF No. 33 Order and WASHOE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Dismissed per ECF No. 33 Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Yang v. County of Siskiyou et al
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Her Seng Yang
Defendant:
County of Siskiyou, John Ottenberg and Andrea Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Freedom Foundation v. Turner, et al.
as 24-768
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM FOUNDATION, a not-for-profit organization
Defendant:
RITA GAIL TURNER, in her official capacity as Litigation Research Coordinator in the Public Records Act Unit of the Office of General Counsel for the Los Angeles Unified School District, DEVORA NAVERA REED, in her official capacity as General Counsel for Los Angeles Unified School District and ALBERTO M. CARVALHO, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Los Angeles Unified School District
Intervenor:
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 99 and others
Smartmatic USA Corp. et al v. Herring Networks, Inc., d/b/a One America News Network et al
as 4:2024mc80008
Plaintiff:
Smartmatic USA Corp., Smartmatic Holding B.V. and SGO Corporation Limited
Defendant:
Herring Networks, Inc., d/b/a One America News Network
Respondent:
Stanford University
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court:
XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor:
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
State of California v. Del Rosa, et al.
as 24-698
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Rob Bonta, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California,
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILLIP DEL ROSA, in his personal and official capacity as Chairman of the Alturas Indian Rancheria, DARREN ROSE, in his personal and official capacity as Vice-chairman of the Alturas Indian Rancheria and WENDY DEL ROSA, in her official capacity as Secretary-Treasurer of the Alturas Indian Rancheria
Defendant:
AZUMA CORPORATION
Hafner v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-616
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, ELLEN ROSENBLUM, Oregon Attorney General, in her official capacity, TINA KOTEK, Oregon Governor, in her official capacity and others
Elena, et al. v. Jones, et al.
as 24-552
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YMELDA ELENA, an individual, MARIO ELENA, an individual and I. J., a minor by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Maria Cervantes, individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Decedent Daniel Elena-Lopez
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM JONES, JR., individually and in official capacity as a police officer for the Los Angeles Police Department
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity
E. v. County of San Bernardino, et al.
as 24-526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. M. E., a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Crystal Helen Camp-Knowles
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, by and through The San Bernardino County Department of Children and Family Services, MELISSA ERB, an individual and ANA FIGUEROA, an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
