Cases 91 - 100 of 1,889
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00563
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Francisco Guillen Duran v. Eric Holder et al
as 5:2013cv01921
Petitioner:
Francisco Guillen Duran
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Wesley Lee, Janet Napolitano and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02520
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013at01194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07642
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07644
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hares Ajmal Ahmadzai v. Wesley Lee et al
as 8:2013cv01611
Petitioner:
Hares Ajmal Ahmadzai
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Holman, Wesley Lee and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02477
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alejandro Rodriguez, et al v. Timothy Robbins, et al
as 13-56755
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, ABDIRIZAK ADEN FARAH, for themselves and on behalf of a class of similarly-situated individuals, JOSE FARIAS CORNEJO and others
Petitioner:
EFREN OROZCO
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY ROBBINS, Field Office Director, Los Angeles District, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, WESLEY LEE, Assistant Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
