Cases 111 - 120 of 388
Williams v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00413
Petitioner:
Jodi Ruth Williams
Respondent:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Williams
as 1:2017cv00404
Plaintiff:
DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wall v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wall
Defendant:
Sandi Jones, Renee Garcia, Shelly Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
William G Stephens and Norma Stephens
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmer v. Wagner Spray Tech Corp et al
as 4:2017cv00372
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Palmer
Defendant:
Wagner Spray Tech Corp , Titan Tools, Inc , Graco, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Butler v. Blades et al
as 1:2017cv00323
Plaintiff:
William D Butler
Defendant:
Randy Blades, D.W. McKay, James Fraiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lapin v. Widmyer et al
as 2:2017cv00304
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lapin
Defendant:
Steven D Widmyer , Jane Doe 1 Widmyer , William T Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Williams v. Brooks et al
as 1:2017cv00223
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Brooks, Nettleton, Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Widmyer et al v. Lapin
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
Steven D Widmyer and William Reagan
Defendant:
Gregory Lapin
Thirdparty_defendant:
BW Real Estate, LLC and Benjamin Widmyer
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Gregory Lapin
Counter_claimant:
Gregory Lapin
Counter_defendant:
William Reagan and Steven D Widmyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Espy v. J.E. Williams Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Lynn H Espy
Defendant:
J.E. Williams Trucking, Inc. , Richard L Chrestenson , J.E. Trucking and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
