Cases 111 - 120 of 151
IN RE STEC, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 8:2009cv01304
Plaintiff:
Fred Jean, Keith Johnson, The Port Authority of Allegheny County Retirement and Disability Allowance Plan for Employees Represented by Local 85 of the Amalgamated Transit Union and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jonathan Fischer, Arman Rashtchi, Keith A Ovitt and others
Petitioner:
The Firefighters' Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust, Building Trades United Pension Pension Trust Fund and Electrical Workers Pension Fund, Local 103 I.B.E.W., STEC, Inc. Investor Group and others
Defendant:
Stec Inc, Manouch Moshayedi, Mark Moshayedi and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Raymond D Cook, J P Morgan Securities Inc, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc and others
Interested Party:
Mark Berry and Jordan Grayson
Intervenor:
West Virginia Laborers Trust Fund
Montana Shooting Sports Associ, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-36094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTANA SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION, GARY MARBUT and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
Intervenor:
STATE OF MONTANA and STEVE BULLOCK, Montana Attorney General
Amicus Curiae:
GOLDWATER INSTITUTE, GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Chesapeake Climate Action Network et al v. Export-Import Bank of the United States et al
as 3:2013cv03532
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Climate Action Network , Friends of the Earth , Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Export-Import Bank of the United States and Fred P. Hochberg
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Keith Judd v. Barack Obama et al
as 2:2013cv02180
Defendant:
Democratic National Committee, Democratic Party of West Virginia and Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Keith Judd
United States of America et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 4:2012mc80286
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Alabama , State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Keith Judd, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 12-57177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH JUDD, ORLY TAITZ, THOMAS G. MACLERAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK OBAMA, in his capacity as a candidate on the ballot for the US President in 2012 election, NATALIE E. TENNANT, in her capacity of West Virginia Secretary of State, DEBRA BOWEN, in her capacity of California Secretary of State and others
Keith Judd v. Barrack Hussein Obama et al
as 2:2012cv09319
Defendant:
Tammy Baldwin, Sherrod Brown, Bob Casey, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Judd
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff:
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
