Cases 111 - 120 of 59,749
Global Protection Corp. v. Thai Nippon Rubber Industry et al
as 2:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Global Protection Corp.
Defendant:
Thai Nippon Rubber Industry and TNR USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
No Tan Lines Republik v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
No Tan Lines Republik
Defendant:
Jim Anderson, Jeanine D'Errico and G Murrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United National Insurance Company v. Geness
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
United National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Ashley Geness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Welch v. Robinson et al
as 2:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D. Welch
Defendant:
Dr. Robinson, Amanda Allred, Dons Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Avanti Residential, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Alea R. Kennedy
Defendant:
Avanti Residential, LLC and Avanti Residential - Fitzsimmons, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. FFIC Goodwill et al
as 2:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Jessica M. Brown
Defendant:
FFIC Goodwill and Adrian Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Gerston
as 2:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Jessica M. Brown
Defendant:
Joseph Gerston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warner et al
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Davis
Defendant:
John Warner and B.C. & T., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Moore v. Benson et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Evan Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Joseph Benson, L. Villegas and Megan Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
