Cases 131 - 140 of 229
Tilton v. Tilton et al
as 1:2007cv01795
Petitioner:
Michael E. Tilton
Respondent:
James E. Tilton and Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberson v. Tilton, et al
as 2:2007cv02648
Plaintiff:
Freddie L. Roberson
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, Tommy Felker, M. Dangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2007cv02557
Plaintiff:
Christopher Monroe
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger and James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Tilton
as 3:2007cv02232
Petitioner:
Clarke Sheldon Lowe
Respondent:
James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur Estrada v. James E Tilton
as 5:2007cv01510
Petitioner:
Arthur Estrada
Respondent:
James E Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Florez v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2007cv05763
Plaintiff:
Armand Florez
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, James E. Tilton, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leon v. Yates et al
as 3:2007cv05719
Petitioner:
David Michael Leon
Respondent:
James A. Yates and James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cannon et al v. Judicial Council of California et al
as 5:2007cv01477
Plaintiff:
Tyrrall Farrow Cannon
Defendant:
Judicial Council of California, Ronald M George, Marcia M Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Carmichael v. Hickman et al
as 4:2007cv05622
Plaintiff:
Raynell Carmichael
Defendant:
Roderick Hickman, James E. Tilton, Richard W. Sandhan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luis Manuel Cardenas v. James E Tilton
as 2:2007cv07216
Petitioner:
Luis Manuel Cardenas
Respondent:
Jame E Tilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
